Your Jira tickets, connected to the code that ships them .
Oracus.ai reads your Jira project and links every ticket to the services it affects, the team that owns it, and the customer flow it touches. So a product owner, campaign manager, or customer lead can ask what shipped, what's blocked, and what it affects — with citations, without flagging an engineer.
What your team can finally ask about Jira
The questions that live in a Jira board but historically needed an engineer to answer — because the answer is only obvious once tickets are joined to the code, services, and owners behind them. Every answer cites its sources.
› Which unresolved bugs touch the billing service?
Two open bugs on billing-engine: PLAT-512 (invoice rounding on multi-currency advertisers, In Progress) and PLAT-548 (double-charge on retried campaigns, In Review). Both sit under the billing-hardening epic; neither has a linked test yet, so coverage is thin.
› Did we actually ship the cross-channel preview epic?
Partially. The epic's spec covers all four channels — today only Meta and X render a real preview, while TikTok and LinkedIn still return a placeholder. Two stories under the epic are still open and unresolved.
› What's the blast radius of ADX-241 before we start it?
It changes creative-validator, which gates approval-service and feeds the four channel syncs. In production terms: every creative awaiting review — and any campaign that can't launch until it passes. Loop in the Workflow and Channels owners before touching it.
› Who owns the tickets blocking the TikTok v3 migration?
The migration epic has four open sub-tasks across two teams. Channels owns the sync rewrite (CHAN-2847, In Progress); Analytics owns the metric-name remap (CHAN-2903, In Review). Tech leads on the hook: @miguel and @ana.
› What is @ana carrying in Payments right now?
Three In-Progress tickets assigned to @ana on the Payments component: a Stripe retry fix (PLAT-618), a refund-rounding bug (PLAT-624), and a story for saved-card support (PLAT-631). The first two are sub-tasks of the payment-reliability epic.
› Which Jira components map to services nobody has deployed to in 90 days?
The LinkedIn and X components both point at linkedin-sync and x-sync, neither of which has seen a deploy or PR since Q4 — yet each still has open tickets. Both integrations had upstream API breaking-change notices in the meantime, so those tickets are aging into risk.
What the connector wires up
Nothing to configure ticket-by-ticket. Oracus.ai reads what's already in Jira — the hierarchy, the components, the workflow — and joins it to your code so the answers hold together.
Tickets → services & code
Every Jira ticket links to the services and repos it touches — via its components, or a simple label convention when your project is team-managed. So 'what does this ticket affect?' has a real answer.
Epics → stories → sub-tasks
Jira's full hierarchy comes across intact, so a question about an epic rolls up every story and sub-task beneath it — and the code beneath those.
Type, status & resolution, native
Bug / Story / Epic types, workflow status, and resolution ingest as-is — so 'what bugs are unresolved in Payments?' just works, with no extra tagging.
One graph, every source
Jira lands in the same knowledge base as your code, tests, and specs — and alongside Linear if some teams run that instead. Assignees and reporters resolve to real people via your GitHub org.
How the sync works
Read-only, keys stay yours, self-hosted by design. A webhook pushes ticket edits as they happen, and a daily sync backstops it — so the picture never drifts from reality. Runs alongside Linear, if your teams use both.
- 1
Connect your project
A Jira Cloud email + API token with read access. Oracus.ai pulls issues, components, and the epic/story/sub-task hierarchy — nothing is written back to Jira.
- 2
Links every ticket to reality
Each ticket is connected to the services that implement it, the team that ships it, and the customer flow it touches. The graph is what makes cross-cutting questions answerable.
- 3
Answers with citations
Every claim names the Jira ticket, service, or owner it came from. The prompt enforces it; the response schema requires it. Hallucinations are structurally hard.
Point Oracus.ai at your Jira
We'll connect a project and a handful of repos, then walk you through the questions your board can suddenly answer — no install on your side, no commitment.